bio news books resources contact current column column archive
Email this page

Now is the time for change in nutrition policy
Nov 12, 08
Suzanne Havala Hobbs

This month’s election results hold out hope for transformational changes needed to fix some of our nation’s most vexing problems, including breakdowns in our financial, health care and educational systems.

But my wish list also includes solutions to another crisis: the national nutrition disaster.

Obesity is just one symptom of a public health crisis more complicated than too many calories and too little exercise. The conditions that lead to obesity also affect other aspects of our diets, increasing the risk of a constellation of diseases and conditions.

That’s where the need for large-scale change comes in.

A substantial evidence base suggests that health is determined by a range of interrelated environmental factors that can make it easier – or harder – to maintain a health-supporting lifestyle.

These factors include physical conditions, such as our proximity to safe parks, sidewalks, bike paths and the distance we travel to get to work. They also include social conditions, such as the examples set by meals served at school or the extent to which children are exposed to ads promoting junk foods.

Nutrition policies play a critical role in setting up a food environment that makes it easier for people to make choices that support health.

But as things stand today, many important nutrition policies are set up to fail. That’s because:

* We have no unified, national nutrition policy. Instead, the responsibility for developing and carrying out nutrition policies is shared among numerous federal agencies, with no single agency taking the lead.

Areas of jurisdiction are often illogical and murky. For example, the nation’s dietary recommendations are produced jointly every five years by the Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services.

But regulation of food-labeling policies and dietary supplements is handled separately by the Food and Drug Administration.

* Conflicts of interest undermine the role of science in dietary guidance. USDA is charged with protecting and supporting the interests of American agriculture.

At the same time, the agency develops national dietary recommendations which guide the national school lunch program and other child nutrition programs.

Science now points to the need for diets lower in processed foods, salt, sugar and animal products. That’s at odds with powerful food industry sectors that stand to lose if dietary recommendations decrease government support for those products.

There are many well-documented examples in which the sugar, meat, dairy and processed food industries have successfully weakened proposed dietary recommendations that would have encouraged us to eat less of these foods.

* We lack accountability. Effective nutrition policies require transparency in decision-making and actions of government agencies.

This includes full disclosure of the business interests of individuals in leadership roles, including those serving on expert panels charged with drafting policy documents.

It’s also gotten harder to gain access to information about how food and nutrition policies are developed. Government press office functions have been centralized, cutting journalists off from direct contact with individuals from key agencies involved in food and health.

If a journalist wants to talk to an expert at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, she needs permission from the Department of Health and Human Services press office.

Once she connects with her source, a second agency official often remains on the phone line while they talk, which can inhibit the flow of information.

* Fiscal policies support the production of junk foods. Our government subsidizes the production of cheeseburgers and soft drinks.

Similar economic incentives are not extended to the production of fruits, vegetables and other health-supporting foods.

There’s no quick fix for any of these problems, and incremental changes aren’t likely to have much impact. Change of the magnitude needed now will require political will and leadership.

Our nation is suffering from a health crisis exacerbated by industry-friendly nutrition policies. It’s time for change.

The contents of this website are not intended to provide personal medical advice.Individual medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional.
Site contents © Suzanne Havala Nutrition Consultants Inc.
www.onthetable.net
Site design:
Seltzer Design